Domestic Violence Lawyers of Arizona
PAYMENT CALCULATOR
Award Winning DV Defense State Wide
What Our Clients Say
Recent Domestic Violence Victories
Threatening or Intimidating – A.R.S. § 13-1202
DISMISSED: Body-cam and digital message review revealed no true threat and established that the statements were constitutionally protected.
Assault – A.R.S. § 13-1203
DISMISSED: Suppression granted after unlawful detention and unconstitutional search, leaving the prosecution without admissible evidence.
Unlawful Imprisonment – A.R.S. § 13-1303
DISMISSED: Dismissed after demonstrating that the alleged restraint never occurred and the accusation was unsupported by physical evidence.
Kidnapping – A.R.S. § 13-1304
NO CHARGES FILED: Reduced and ultimately dismissed when video evidence proved voluntary movement and no intent to hold or restrain the alleged victim.
Criminal Trespass (1st, 2nd, 3rd Degree) – A.R.S. § 13-1502, 13-1503, 13-1504
NO CHARGES FILED: Charges dismissed after proving our client had lawful permission to be on the property.
Criminal Damage – A.R.S. § 13-1602
DISMISSED: Dismissed when repair receipts and property owner statements disproved any actual damage.
Interfering with Judicial Proceedings – A.R.S. § 13-2810
DISMISSED: After establishing our client never violated a valid order and the alleged communication was permitted, prosecutors agreed to dismiss the charges.
Disorderly Conduct – A.R.S. § 13-2904
DISMISSED: Case dismissed when evidence showed no intent to disturb the peace; eyewitness statements contradicted the complaint.
How We Defend Domestic Violence Cases
Self-Defense
- Explanation: We argue that the accused only used reasonable force to protect themselves from an immediate threat of harm.
- Key Elements: The force used must be proportional to the threat, and we emphasize that the accused did not provoke the confrontation.
- Supporting Evidence: Medical reports, witness testimony, or even past violent behavior from the alleged victim can support a self-defense claim.
False Allegations
- Explanation: We demonstrate that the accusations are unfounded and possibly made out of spite, jealousy, or to gain leverage in a custody or divorce case.
- Key Elements: Investigating the background of the relationship to expose motives for fabrication, such as revenge or manipulation.
- Supporting Evidence: Text messages, emails, or social media posts that contradict the accuser’s claims, along with character witnesses.
Lack of Evidence
- Explanation: We challenge the prosecution’s evidence, arguing that it is insufficient or unreliable to support a conviction.
- Key Elements: Highlight gaps in the evidence, such as the absence of medical records, conflicting witness testimony, or lack of physical proof.
- Supporting Evidence: Pointing to a lack of corroboration from medical reports or eyewitnesses and using expert testimony to explain why the evidence is inconclusive.
Consent
- Explanation: In cases where physical contact occurred, we argue that it was consensual and not an act of violence.
- Key Elements: Demonstrating that both parties engaged willingly in the physical activity or that the actions were misunderstood as abusive.
- Supporting Evidence: Text messages, videos, or other records showing the alleged victim consented to the act in question.
Accidental Injury
- Explanation: We assert that any injuries sustained were the result of an accident and not intentional violence.
- Key Elements: Showing that the injury occurred during an unintended action, such as a slip or fall.
- Supporting Evidence: Medical reports showing how the injuries could be consistent with an accident rather than assault, along with testimonies from witnesses present during the incident.
Contradicting Witness Testimony
- Explanation: We scrutinize witness statements and testimonies, highlighting inconsistencies or contradictions that weaken the prosecution’s case.
- Key Elements: Cross-examining witnesses to expose discrepancies or bias.
- Supporting Evidence: Using depositions, prior statements, or other forms of documentation to demonstrate inconsistencies in the accounts provided by witnesses.
No Visible Injuries
- Explanation: We argue that the absence of physical evidence or injuries diminishes the credibility of the accusation.
- Key Elements: Emphasizing the lack of medical documentation or police photographs showing injuries at the time of the incident.
- Supporting Evidence: Cross-examining medical experts or presenting testimony from law enforcement officers who documented no visible signs of injury.
Lack of Intent
- Explanation: We argue that the accused did not have the intent to harm the alleged victim, which is a crucial element in proving domestic violence.
- Key Elements: Showing that the contact or event was accidental or occurred without malice.
- Supporting Evidence: Testimony from the accused or witnesses explaining the nature of the incident, along with evidence showing the absence of premeditation or prior violent behavior.
How Much Could A Conviction Change Your Life?
A Criminal Conviction In Arizona Can Have Lasting, Life-Changing Consequences
Parenting Rights
College Admission
Financial Aid
Military Career
Professional Licenses
Voting Rights
We Are Ready To Defend And Protect Your Rights
Time Is Running Out
Our Firm
Award-Winning Representation In Arizona
SEE RED & BLUE. CALL TAMOU!
Our clients are at the center of everything we do, and our compassionate and aggressive legal team can take the time to fully understand your situation and help you make the best use of your legal options.
Call us today or fill out our online contact form to schedule your free consultation and get started on fighting your Domestic Violence Case!
How We Are Different
What Makes Us Different From Other Domestic Violence Law Firms
Proven Experience
Most attorneys may handle 50-60 cases over the course of a year. Michael R Tamou managed hundreds of cases annually. This exposure allowed him to become extremely familiar with the judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers involved in these matters, giving him a unique edge when advocating for his clients.
Impressive Success
Michael R Tamou boasts a track record of over 1,000 individual case wins, and it’s essential to note that this number represents his sole efforts, not a combined total with other attorneys.
Direct Representation
At Arizona Criminal Defense & DUI Lawyers you can count on Michael R Tamou to personally represent you. Unlike some firms that may promote their owner but assign your case to an associate attorney, we provide the experience you seek and pay for. With us, there’s no bait-and-switch – you’ll have Michael Tamou as your dedicated attorney from start to finish.
Comprehensive Support
For premier defense in Arizona, turn to Michael Tamou and the Arizona Criminal Defense & DUI Lawyers. We offer a complimentary consultation, and in emergency situations, we provide 24-hour emergency services.